Death as Lagging Indicator

I’ve been using covid death data as a proxy indicator for infections because it’s not subject to the systematic distortions and gross undercounting that characterize confirmed test-positive diagnoses. US covid deaths have decreased substantially over the past month and a half, but obviously death is a lagging indicator of current contagion rates,  as this article emphasizes:

President Donald Trump and Republican governors are pointing to fewer coronavirus deaths to suggest that the worst of the coronavirus pandemic has passed — and to blunt criticism that a surge of new infections in more than half the states is proof the country reopened too soon. But that’s a dangerous gamble. Death rates tell nothing about the current spread of the virus and only offer a snapshot of where the country was roughly three weeks ago.

That’s true enough, but test-positives too are a lagging indicator. In this country testing has typically been reserved for people experiencing symptoms severe and persistent enough for them to seek medical attention. Due to chronic shortages in the supply chain, test results are often delayed by several days. To paraphrase the article: Test-positives offer a snapshot of where the country was roughly two weeks ago.

All else equal, trends in the test-positive rate would manifest themselves a week later in death trends. But over the past month and a half all else has not been equal: diagnoses have been steady or rising, while deaths have been falling. What’s not equal?

  1. Testing rate. All else equal, more tests yield more test-positives.
  2. Clinical practice. Fewer deaths imply fewer severe cases, which opens up the healthcare system’s capacity for diagnosing and treating less severe cases.
  3. Public behavior. If older people stay home while younger people increasingly return to work and to socializing without masks, then new infections shift downward to an age demographic that’s less prone to severe illness and death.

So far the only one of these three un-equalizers that’s been validated empirically is the increased testing rate. There’s anecdotal evidence, supplemented by some localized data, supporting a downward age shift in hospitalizations. It’s not yet clear whether this trend is due to increases in actual infection rates among the younger demographic, or to an expansion in medical capacity toward treating less severe cases, which in turn would result in a younger patient population.

The worst might be over, as the Administration claims, or – more likely — the US has just witnessed the ebbing of its first wave and the beginning of a second. It’s possible to envision a strategy behind Trump and company’s recklessness. Is he going for herd immunity? Is it more important to keep Americans free than to keep them alive — is the exercise of everyone’s personal liberty to move about the country unencumbered by social distancing and masks more important than slowing or stopping the epidemic? Is it the economy, stupid? Or is it just plain stupid? Any way you look at it, whatever limited successes America has experienced in dealing with its public health crisis, and however many illnesses have been prevented and lives spared, these modest accomplishments have been achieved despite Trump’s interventions.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s